Dental and Medical Problems

Dent. Med. Probl.
Index Copernicus (ICV 2018) – 113.05
MNiSW – 20
Average rejection rate – 70.86%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2019, vol. 56, nr 4, October-December, p. 379–384

doi: 10.17219/dmp/111976

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Evaluation of the change in the tongue posture and in the hyoid bone position after Twin Block appliance therapy in skeletal class II subjects

Ocena zmiany położenia języka oraz kości gnykowej po leczeniu aparatem Twin Block wady szkieletowej II klasy

Erum Afzal1,A,B,C,D, Mubassar Fida1,A,E,F

1 The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Abstract

Background. The tongue is posteriorly postured in a retrognathic mandible, and Twin Block appliance (TBA) therapy places the tongue and the hyoid bone in a favorable position to eliminate the risk of causing respiratory obstruction.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in the tongue posture and in the hyoid bone position after TBA therapy.
Material and Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted using the pre-functional (PF1), postfunctional (PF2) and post-treatment (PT) cephalograms of 30 growing subjects. The tongue posture at 6 distances and the hyoid bone position with 4 parameters were digitally measured using the Rogan-Delft View Pro-X® software. A digital vernier caliper was used to determine the inter-canine and inter-molar widths on the dental casts. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the PF1 and PF2 values, and the PF1 and PT values.
Results. The comparison of the PF1 and PF2 values showed significant differences in the tongue posture at distances 1–5. In the case of the hyoid bone, only the linear distance from the sella (S) to the most anterior point on the hyoid bone (H) – the SH distance – revealed a significant difference (p < 0.01). The change in the tongue posture and in the hyoid bone position achieved at the PF2 stage remained stable at the PT stage. Significant differences occurred in the PF1 and PF2 maxillary and mandibular inter-canine and inter-molar widths (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, and p < 0.01 and p = 0.02), respectively.
Conclusion. Twin Block appliance therapy resulted in the advancement of the mandible with a lowered posturing of the tongue. The hyoid bone was displaced inferiorly after TBA therapy, whereas the angular position of the hyoid bone remained unchanged.

Key words

malocclusion, functional appliance, hyoid bone, class II

Słowa kluczowe

nieprawidłowy zgryz, aparat funkcyjny, kość gnykowa, klasa II

References (40)

  1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2013.
  2. Bavbek NC, Tuncer BB, Turkoz C, Ulusoy C, Tuncer C. Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1747–1755.
  3. Carlson DS. Theories of craniofacial growth in the postgenomic era. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(4):172–183.
  4. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M. Pattern of malocclusion in orthodontic patients: A hospital-based study. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(1):43–47.
  5. Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance vs the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in growing Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):784–789.
  6. Yamaguchi H, Sueishi K. Malocclusion associated with abnormal posture. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2003;44(2):43–54.
  7. Bandy HE, Hunter WS. Tongue volume and the mandibular dentition. Am J Orthod. 1969;56(2):134–142.
  8. Jacobs RM. Muscle equilibrium: Fact or fancy. Angle Orthod. 1969;39(1):11–21.
  9. Lin YC, Lin HC, Tsai HH. Changes in the pharyngeal airway and position of the hyoid bone after treatment with a modified bionator in growing patients with retrognathia. J Exp Clin Med. 2011;3(2):93–98.
  10. Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, Jena AK. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:68.
  11. Graber TM. Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1966.
  12. Santos Junior JF, Abrahão M, Gregório LC, Zonato AI, Gumieiro EH. Genioplasty for genioglossus muscle advancement in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome and mandibular retrognathia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;73(4):480–486.
  13. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(5):599.e1–e12.
  14. Clark WJ. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93(1):1–8.
  15. Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Dental and skeletal changes in mild to moderate Class II malocclusions treated by either a Twin-block or Xbow appliance followed by full fixed orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(6):997–1002.
  16. Brierley CA, DiBiase A, Sandler PJ. Early class II treatment. Aust Dent J. 2017;62(S1):4–10.
  17. Restrepo C, Santamaría A, Peláez S, Tapias A. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(8):588–594.
  18. Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D. Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):260–264.
  19. Yassaei S, Tabatabaei Z, Ghafurifard R. Stability of pharyngeal airway dimensions: Tongue and hyoid changes after treatment with a functional appliance. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2012;23(1):9–15.
  20. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959;29(1):8–29.
  21. DeVincenzo JP. Changes in mandibular length before, during, and after successful orthopedic correction of Class II malocclusions, using a functional appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99(3):241–257.
  22. Charlier JP, Petrovic A, Herrmann-Stutzmann J. Effects of mandi­bular hyperpropulsion on the prechondroblastic zone of young rat condyle. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(1):71–74.
  23. DeVincenzo JP. A study in human subjects using a new device designed to mimic the protrusive functional appliances used previously in monkeys. Am J Orthod. 1987;91(3):213–224.
  24. Jena AK, Duggal R. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(3):485–491.
  25. Baysal A, Uysal T. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod. 2011;35(1):71–81.
  26. Johnston LE Jr. Functional appliances: A mortgage on mandibular position. Aust Orthod J. 1996;14(3):154–157.
  27. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(1):24–33.
  28. Schütz TC, Dominguez GC, Hallinan MP, Cunha TC, Tufik S. Class II correction improves nocturnal breathing in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(2):222–228.
  29. Tseng YC, Wu JH, Chen CM, Hsu KJ. Correlation between change of tongue area and skeletal stability after correction of mandibular prognathism. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017;33(6):302–307.
  30. Muto T, Yamazaki A, Takeda S. A cephalometric evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with mandibular retrognathia and prognathia, and normal subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(3):228–231.
  31. Nanda M, Singla A, Negi A, Jaj HS, Mahajan V. The association between maxillomandibular sagittal relationship and pharyngeal airway passage dimensions. J Ind Orthod Soc. 2012;46(1):48–52.
  32. Poon KH, Chay SH, Chiong KF. Airway and craniofacial changes with mandibular advancement device in Chinese with obstructive sleep apnea. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37(8):637–44.
  33. Liu Y, Zeng X, Fu M, Huang X, Lowe AA. Effects of a mandibular repositioner on obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(3):248–256.
  34. Zhou L, Zhao Z, Lu D. The analysis of the changes of tongue shape and position, hyoid position in Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with functional appliances (FR-I) [in Chinese]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000;18(2):123–125.
  35. Schendel SA, Epker BN. Results after mandibular advancement surgery: An analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surg. 1980;38(4):265–282.
  36. LaBanc JP, Epker BN. Changes of the hyoid bone and tongue following advancement of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;57(4):351–356.
  37. Graber LW. Hyoid changes following orthopedic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1978;48(1):33–38.
  38. Eggensperger N, Smolka K, Johner A, Rahal A, Thüer U, Iizuka T. Long-term changes of hyoid bone and pharyngeal airway size following advancement of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99(4):404–410.
  39. Ozbek MM, Memikoglu UT, Altug-Atac AT, Lowe AA. Stability of maxillary expansion and tongue posture. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(2):214–220.
  40. Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, et al. Tongue posture improvement and pharyngeal airway enlargement as secondary effects of rapid maxillary expansion: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(2):235–245.